The right to choose, as described by the liberal hacks that support infanticide in the name of convenience. The rape/incest argument does not hold up, because you are taking the most rare incident and making it appear to be the case all the time. This is one of the ridiculous liberal arguments, for something that really doesn't need to be debated in a so called "civilized"society. I point out this "right to choose"term, to shed some light on the other things that liberals believe should be a choice. If you are having some trouble thinking of anything other than baby killing, that the liberal ideology deems, a choice for an individual to make on his/her own, you are not alone.
Typical lib thinking, states that people need to be told, how much of something to drink, or eat, what kind of gas mileage your car needs to get, what kind of light bulb you need to use in your home( hint: it needs to be toxic if it is broken, and has to assist in acquiring skin cancer). Don't forget, that we need to be told what health insurance to buy, or, in the case that one does not want to purchase it, we need to be forced by Uncle Sam and threatened with jail time, because only the government knows what is good for us. We need to be told by uncle sam what to feed our kids, because by nature, we are horrible parents. Plus, we all know that the public school system will turn out good little communists, so that they can be the dictators of tomorrow.
The question that I have for the party who goes to bat"for the little guy", would have to be, "where are the choices"? The push for more government control makes me physically sick. The latest from the nanny state," we don't think that you need to have assault weapons to hunt deer.". First question for the all knowing Obammy administration, has to be, "define an assault weapon". Every liberal that answers this question, will give you a different answer. Now, onto my second question for the liberal hacks, "have you ever read the Constitution?". The answer you will get for this question will probably go something like this," we don't read the bills that we vote on, so what makes you think we need to read the Constitution?".
Let me simplify the second amendment, for my liberal friends out there that don't process factual information all that well. I am going to quote Judge Andrew Napolitano to drive home my point, "the 2nd amendment does not give us the right to shoot at deer, it gives us the right to shoot at the government when it is taken over by tyrants". The liberal hypocrisy, and the death of individual liberty, upsets me, but notmas much as it saddens me. America was built on the idea, that the individual can only reach full potential, if the government shackles are removed, hence allowing innovation, and creativity, to provide the highest standard of living that man has ever known. We are moving backwards, we need to wake up and stop running in the direction of communism. Let's get back to basics.